The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if we place those proteins in a human cell you can poison the mitochondria at any of five different ways and the cell will still proliferate because it has our protein that evolutionarily we believe allowed that organism to lose its etc' to begin with
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we're using other approaches that are evolutionarily inspired we call these protein prostheses where we take proteins from other organisms from other kingdoms of life we transplant them into human cells with mitochondrial disease and we can effectively rescue the cells