Rhonda Patrick· PhD
Lac ->Pyr costs no energy
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Lac ->Pyr costs no energy
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Yeah, it is. It's more reduced, so it actually has more energy than pyruvate. And, as you said, energy comes free.
I always think about lactate, as a source of energy, being thermodynamically favorable because you don't need energy to convert lactate into pyruvate, but you need energy to convert glucose into pyruvate.