The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
some will have very few mitochondria okay so they just don't have quantitatively enough organelles to do respect respiration but what seems to be there seems to be functional - partially functional other cells as I said are loaded with mitochondria but when you look at them they're morphologically abnormal
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
he found that in every kind of a cancer cell no matter what kind of it is there was some defect in the number structure or function of the mitochondria
not every cancer cell will have the exact same defect in respiration in the mitochondria
you have to look at a mitochondria and say no that mitochondria that has no cristae and is very few in number there's nothing wrong with it okay let's call it white black and black white
the work from Pete Peterson showed that they have defective respiration so I mean they have defective mitochondria structure number and function besides many other studies have shown so you know that they can't be doing oxidative phosphorylation or respiration because they're very organelle that is needed for that is deficient in some way