The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Normal mitochondrial metabolism is generating pro-oxidants, right? And these pro-oxidants, they're a normal byproduct from normal metabolism. But, you know, in addition they end up damaging DNA, damaging lipids, and proteins. And that happens, it accumulates over time of age.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.