The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
my bio engineering colleagues being able to collaborate with me and develop a device that we can transcranial II do imaging with near-infrared spectroscopy and actually measure the concentrations of oxidized cytochrome oxidase in vivo in the human brain and we published that last year and this allows us to directly have a measurement that we are indeed engaging our target and this also will allow us to find what is the optimal dose response for that particular brain
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.