The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
You clearly need mTORC1 activity to maintain healthy synapses, certainly during brain growth. If you make mutations around a growing animal, you basically don't have a cortex, right? On the other hand, you clearly need to be able to modulate mTORC1 to have some level of autophagy to keep the system healthy.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.