The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it may turn out that you know nad supplementation is super valuable medically i am completely open to that and i would love that to be the case um but i think if so it's going to be because there are select cell types that are genuinely severely nad depleted and that we will need to figure out how to restore nad in those cell types and then we may see big health benefits
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.