The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And then NADPH can distribute those high energy or direct those high energy electrons to do things like form carboncarbon bonds, convert riboucleotides into deoxy ribboucleotides, right? So then because we have to make all of our own RNA, we have to make all of our own DNA. We have to make all of our own lipids. We have to make all of our own proteins, right?
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So let's call out the other two which are NADP++ and NADPH which is which are really really important for anabolism anabolism right making stuff right so we like to say that metabolism is the set of processes by which we convert everything that we eat into everything that we are and everything that we do and the maintenance of all of the things that we are and and do, right? >> So, one of the really amazing things that NAD co-enzymes can do is they can um take the high energy electrons on NAD, which is NADH, and get those high energy electrons put onto NADP forming NADPH. And then NADPH can distribute those high energy or direct those high energy electrons to do things like form carboncarbon bonds, convert riboucleotides into deoxy ribboucleotides, right?