The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So sleep, I'm not sure a study has been done exactly on sleep, but um for sure in mice um we've looked at, you know, young mice that have really good um chrono synchrony and older mice that are kind of losing their synchrony and the NAD system becomes disturbed. There's a lot of time of day cues that go into NAD synthesis and NAD dependent metabolic processes.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.