Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
So the question is you know if all these really important functions are NAD is central to them. >> Yes. >> Right. What happens if there's a limiting amount of NAD? Like how does the body triage or does the body triage? Who gets the NAD pool? How do we know if we're able to make enough NAD? Like where where like what's the bottleneck here?
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.