The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it appears to be that nad extracellular nad is from dead cells from dying cells and maybe from cells that are undergoing some sort of stress response and are secreting it to some degree to reflect their energy status
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
it has to be the case that extracellular nad is primarily a signaling function and so it's definitely not a normal way of transporting an ad from tissue to tissue