The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when cells become senescent they can secrete molecules that tend to have the following qualities they are pro-inflammatory they're involved in immune activation and evading the immune system they're involved in growth signaling and also involved in angiogenesis which plays a role in cancer metastasis nad seems to increase this quality of senescence cells likely because it's being used in terms of energy metabolism so it's making these senescence cells even more tumorigenic
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.