The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
the animal evidence you mentioned some of the supplements you know precursors that can form nad I think that the animal evidence suggests that it can at least in rodents improve health span particularly in models with light that are heavily dependent on mitochondria like muscle myopathy models or something like that I think I think that was one and also the brain
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Now we do know in animal studies that I think that has been shown because it's affecting the might of contacted those animal models of myopathy and stuff and mitochondrial function was improved and all that stuff so so when animal models it obviously is affecting mitochondrial function so it must be getting to the right place
I think that was one and also the brain so I think those are the two the two organs I've seen like major positive effects with with nad supplementation
The animal evidence suggests that it can, at least in rodents, improve health span, particularly in models that are heavily dependent on mitochondria, like muscle myopathy models or something like that. I think that was one. And also the brain.
So the animal evidence, you mentioned some of the supplements, you know, precursors that can form NAD. I think that the animal evidence suggests that it can, at least in rodents, improve health span, particularly in models that are heavily dependent on mitochondria, like muscle myopathy models