The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And I loved that enzyme um because it had two active sites. It had the glutaminase active site that interacts with this amino acid and then it's liberating an ammonia group and somehow it's shuttling the ammonia group from one active site to the other active site where it's going to form NAD+.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And the the interesting thing to me was that all of the ukareotic ones, the ones in yeast and human and flies, etc., etc., had what was what I could see was a glutaminase domain, an enzyme that will take an am a vitam amino acid glutamine and convert it to glutamate liberating an ammonia group, a nitrogen group.