The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Uh I also think that these things will be more efficacious in the context of energetic metabolic stress. So for someone who's already aged where your NAD level tanks and goes down uh in a linear fashion like with age uh NAD goes down but also in the con context of like traumatic brain injury or shock or and these are the things that we study.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.