Paul Saladino· MD
when people are healthy they don't really need to supplement nad
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when people are healthy they don't really need to supplement nad
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if not then all the extra NAD in the world should have no benefit because you're just adding more substrate to a reaction where it's not needed.
Uh conversely, if NAD levels are going down because there's a production issue and if you provided more of it, you could actually do more good, well then it could be the exact opposite story.