The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and so you would only be able by looking at LC 3 1 & 2 in PBMCs in a person that was fasting you would only be able to infer autophagy flux because you wouldn't actually be able to measure it it's a clue a clue it wouldn't be proof but it would be one could presume I would expect you would see more conversion of 1 to 2 and then to going into the lysosome I don't think that would get you the answer that you need
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.