The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
is there's been a team of seven chemists working on much better molecules than any of these two that I'm talking about, super NAD boosters. And we have ones that work far better than NMN. And these are timed release. These are what we call prodrugs. And those are the ones that I'm really excited about for medicines of the future that don't just increase someone's endurance but could actually treat diabetes, and heart disease, and cancer, and Alzheimer's.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.