The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if i were to tally up the number of questions i get per month about nr and nmn versus rapid logs the the ratio is the exact opposite to the magnitude so if the effect size of rapamycin and the importance of mtor is 10x that of sirtuins it's flipped in the number of questions i get
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if the effect size of rapamycin and the importance of mtor is 10x that of sirtuins it's flipped in the number of questions i get um about it and just the you know the pop culture awareness of of of that