Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
Um and and specifically I want to get into the you know let's say you're taking a an NAD precursor supplement like a nicotenomide ribocide >> and you do see that as you mentioned that you'll see the NAD levels go up like very high in the blood. What does that tell us about levels in the brain? Can we assume I mean I don't know that we can or can we assume that the levels are going to go up in the brain or in the muscle?
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.