The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Um, you know, this is an an area where, you know, it's a little bit like the sports trainers being out um ahead of randomized trials. Um the animal results are so strong and that generally the safety data are so you know uh comforting that um there are a lot of women that are you know presumably taking 500 milligrams or a gram of Niogen you know per day during pregnancy or to get pregnant.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there's no human data Um however, you know, as soon as um our group published this work, we got calls from UC Davis and um the whole group in Sacramento that works on human lactation and model system lactation.