The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there's a lot of data in rodents where also you look you give it in different ways you give it some in water but some are gavage and maybe that's different because one of the problems may be if you go deep enough you can bypass circulation right you can bypass something so you know but the in vivo studies are good studies okay you just don't know what it means to humans
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the development the interesting development will be to develop a drug and the drug will be a precursor that will get into the blood outside of the liver outside of the liver yeah exactly so if you could give NR or n MN sublingually or intravenously that strikes me as very interesting