Peter Attia· MD
it would seem that the only way to increase cellular nad would be would would be to use intravenous doses of n r or n MN
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it would seem that the only way to increase cellular nad would be would would be to use intravenous doses of n r or n MN
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so i think you end up with you know probably effective nad supplementation when you go the iv route in other words taking iv nad will probably increase into intracellular nad levels though not directly because there's not a transporter but it goes through this sort of circuitous route to get there so it might not be the most efficient way to do it
in other words when you give intravenous nad there is no transporter to take nad into a cell but that nad breaks down into things like nr and nmn and in the vascular system we know that those things can get taken up at least into some cells
Oral vs. IV nicotinamide riboside