The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I no I don't think so I don't think that would be the most sensitive thing and I think we will eventually see a paper showing that that's not true because I've heard Brenner on a podcast say that he measured homocysteine and he measured s adenosylmethionine levels in the blood and showed that it doesn't have any if fact so I didn't see that paper so yours yeah but I think it will come out
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I expect that sometime rather soon we're gonna see a paper coming out showing that it doesn't elevate homocysteine and showing that it doesn't affect the s-adenosylmethionine in plasma