The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when we look at it uh for example you you mentioned that or atlete or My athletes are are are um uh using a lot of carbohydrates uh for for fueling and so on we also know that basically the 60 to 90 grams per hour that's not a limitation either it's much much much higher than that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we know that with glucose or glucose polymers that is about at a rate of 1 to 1.1 grams per minute so about 60 to 70 grams per hour
and the conventional thinking has always been that you can only consume about 60 gam of glucose per hour and 60 gram of glucose of course is only about 240 kilo calories