The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you could argue through that analysis that you're much better off with a high protein strategy even if it's throughout life because the absolute reduction in mortality would unquestionably be lower as a result of the benefit you would have later in life
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So yes, it matters um uh and it may be that that we now want to shift a little from one toward the other and it may even change during the course of life, right? It may be that at one point in life my goal is to be as perhaps big and strong as I can. Maybe at another point in life it's to slow aging and I may have different strategies for those two different things.