Paul Saladino· MD
it's the Nitro so iron and the Nitro so thiols with meat which have not been found to form DNA addicts which are sort of DNA breaks and DNA aggregations
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it's the Nitro so iron and the Nitro so thiols with meat which have not been found to form DNA addicts which are sort of DNA breaks and DNA aggregations
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
clinical evidence suggests that the type of end nitrosal compounds found after ingestion of red meat in humans consists mainly of nitrosyl iron and nitrocephales products that have profoundly different chemistries from certain end nitroso species which have been shown to be tumorogenic through the formation of dna adducts