The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
let's use the okinawa as an example up until recently not including this generation which i've read have sort of fallen off the rails but if you go back a generation and beyond of the okinawa who obviously would have been consuming seafood daily how much epa and dha would they have consumed they were probably in the neighborhood of one and a half maybe two grams that I 2000 milligrams
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.