The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And this shows up in wildlife as well. I interviewed Stephanie Senna. She's a glyphosate researcher and I talked with her about it and she told me that well she sent me the literature on even deer and other wildlife having birth defects from having babies out in these corn fields that are being sprayed with Iowa.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.