The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there are absolutely things that I do you for me it's clearly overindulging in food often right even when I'm saying to myself Peter you don't need to be eating this extra helping of dessert or whatever um how do I think about that in a way to not overanalyze this or over interpret it right I mean how do you how do you decide if you know my my oving is actually a canary in the coal mine that says hey there's something going on inside of you emotionally
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.