Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
is there a long-term effect from a cumulative effect of whatever you know defense chemicals these plants release i don't know because i've only heard paul talk about that and i don't i would like to see someone debate him who is logical and objective and reasonable and well-educated
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so mean is there a long-term effect from a cumulative effect of whatever you know defense chemicals these plants release i don't know because i've only heard paul talk about that