The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the reason we all agree that that standard nitrogen balance underestimates the requirement is it's easier to measure the sum of the ins than the sum of the outs yeah exactly and and and the chances are you're significantly underestimating the outlets yeah
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the reason we all agree that that standard nitrogen balance underestimates the requirement is it's easier to measure the sum of the ends than the sum of the outs
everyone who knows nitrogen balance says that nitrogen balance underestimates requirement everybody uniformly