We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
So in that way, we think that ketones are not, you know, an ideal fuel for tumors, and in our model systems, you know, it's very clear that they cannot run...in the absence of glucose, tumor cells die, whereas even in the presence of consistent glucose when we add ketones, there seems to be a decrease in proliferation.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.