The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and sure enough after I don't know maybe 8 to 12 weeks same macronutrient distribution in terms of fat protein carbohydrate the only shift was the type of fat so we just substituted mono for saturated his LDL P was thirteen hundred animal per liter all of the inflammation was gone and all of the sterile biomarkers went back to normal
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the road should have saturated and basically in the literature these studies have all looked at the ratio of saturated to mono and polyunsaturated fat and for whatever reason people with those snips when they have a higher saturated fat poly your mono and or mono they have higher inflammation higher oxidized LDL higher a small dense LDL higher you just you know all these just tell you have a sense of the frequency based on the research you've done on this how prevalent that is