The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you're MTHFR is dirty meaning if you have polymorphisms at the 677 or 1298 position you want to make sure you're getting enough riboflavin you want to make sure you're getting enough methylfolate in the foods you eat and then you want to make sure you check your homocysteine
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you are riboflavin deficient you will not make l-methylfolate as well as someone that has enough riboflavin and especially if you have an mthfr polymorphism like i do specifically 677c to t you will be very bad at making l-methylfolate if you don't get enough folate and riboflavin