The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
generally speaking the more refined food it is i'm pretty comfortable saying that it's going to be worse for human health no matter along the spectrum talk about honey talking about sugar if you talk about grains talk about oil let's talk about anything the more refined it is the worse it's going to be for human health
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
get to the most common like basically common denominator of like this is the most unrefined version of this food as possible
we can clearly say refinement is not good for humans evolutionarily and we can try and show data like the study with nitric oxide metabolites that are being removed