The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
lactose intolerance means that we don't possess the lactase enzyme in the brush border of our small intestine the sugar which is glucose and galactose so lactose is a disaccharide of glucose and galactose passes through our small intestine it's supposed to get degraded there by lactose and moves down into large bowel where it can get fermented causing gas pain that is lactose intolerance that is not the same as inflammation
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I am not familiar with any evidence that shows that lactose intolerance is associated with inflammation just means we don't have the enzyme in our stomachs to digest lactose