Rhonda Patrick· PhD
So instead of focusing on what you're not gonna eat, why don't you focus on adding more of the things that are good and allowing that kind of gut population to morph accordingly?
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So instead of focusing on what you're not gonna eat, why don't you focus on adding more of the things that are good and allowing that kind of gut population to morph accordingly?
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.