The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i also do think that the there isn't sufficient data to support a detriment of anti-nutrients such as lectins phytates goitrogens or phytoestrogens in certain plant foods uh when it comes to actual hard outcomes in humans even if there is mechanistic plausibility and especially under the context of a nutrient sufficient diet
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.