Peter Attia· MD
athlete you have to be fat adapted now that doesn't mean you have to be in nutritional ketosis but you must be fat adapted you do not want to do these things with an RQ above about 0.75 to 0.8
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
athlete you have to be fat adapted now that doesn't mean you have to be in nutritional ketosis but you must be fat adapted you do not want to do these things with an RQ above about 0.75 to 0.8
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
by fad adapting I would you know bill I I'd like to you know have done those swims at an RQ of 0.75 which would dramatically decrease my requirement