We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
Western medicine, mainstream western medicine doesn't do quantitative PCR DNA testing of stool that I've ever seen. You go go to a board-certified gastronurologist and they're going to say you don't have anything in your gut. We looked at a stool ova and parasites, right, by microscopy mostly. They might do an elya um which is an enzyme linked um uh immunoabsorbent assay, but it's not as specific or as sensitive as a quantitative PCR.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.