Peter Attia· MD
all of the concepts were developed for growth where nitrogen balance was positive you could measure a change over time and as we've now tried to start applying that to non-growing adults it gets a lot more vague
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
all of the concepts were developed for growth where nitrogen balance was positive you could measure a change over time and as we've now tried to start applying that to non-growing adults it gets a lot more vague
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the recommended dietary allowance or the RDA for protein of 0.8 gr per kilogram per day is thought by many to be too low this is because the RDA was derived from nitrogen balance studies which have limitations due to incomplete collection and inaccurate estimates of amino acid loss