Paul Saladino· MD
so this is a very important thing to contrast that fructose in isolation does not perform equivalently to fructose in fruit when we look at research studies
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so this is a very important thing to contrast that fructose in isolation does not perform equivalently to fructose in fruit when we look at research studies
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and the rest of the studies are left out which may show that fruit or fruit containing fructose fructose present in a food matrix actually has a different effect in human physiology so for instance this is an interesting study that i will share the title of this one is orange juice or fructose intake does not induce oxidative or inflammatory response i focus on the orange juice i find it interesting that fructose intake did not induce oxidative response in this one i would not recommend fructose intake but they compared it four groups eight subjects each normal weight were given a 300 calorie drink of glucose 75 grams fructose 75 grams or orange juice or water sweetened with saccharin a control group to drink and then blood samples were taken