The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and he said that it turns out that um some of the villages or the the clinics I forget how many clinics in total there there were in the study but at 11 of the clinics they one of the uh investigators were randomizing the entire clinics um to one group and that this is what I think is really interesting about just looking at like if you really want to dig into a study sometimes you really have to get the story which is and and why you think it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
that that's typically referred to as a so you can do that in a study and that's typically referred to as a as a cluster a cluster randomization where you might you might randomize one classroom to another classroom which might be convenient but it it requires different statistical methods