The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when he ate a meal so this is Nathan and Nick both of whom are metabolically healthy neither of who have insulin resistance they were both able to eat a meal that was very high in protein and very high in fat and had no postprandial change in triglycerides and then no change in the visual quality of the blood meaning that there were the blood wasn't cloudy as they claimed it would be in game-changers
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if they had just fed sky's a meal with protein and fat they would not have seen this delayed clearance of triglycerides from the blood