The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there's no question that plants contain anti-nutrients and fence chemicals the only question is how well adapted any individual is to eating these compounds and certainly there are systems in our body to deal with them phase one and facing detoxification in the liver but there's inter-individual variation in terms of how we do this and i think for some people they are pretty problematic
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and i think for some people they are pretty problematic
you don't want to be inhibiting your phase 1 and phase 2 detoxification but plant compounds will be detoxified by those and there's variability between humans in terms of how much they can do with each plant compound