The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the record only starts to shows in very you know reasonable or significant increase in the consumption of plants at 25 000 years ago so and do you think that was the beginnings of agriculture or pre pre-agriculture maybe 11 000.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there is an increase in the consumption and in our ability to consume plants starting about 85 000 years ago right 85 000 years ago we start to see it in africa and in europe in other places the the record only starts to shows in very you know reasonable or significant increase in the consumption of plants at 25 000 years ago