The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
so when you are trying to deal with an autoimmune case you do have to be straight for quite some time to try and clean the system out and then you can reintroduce things to see if they're offending but you have to do it one at a time to I don't obviously you can do lab tests and stuff like that but but I was that's always a story of a case study that we found rather remarkable
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I think this is important perhaps for your listeners when you talk about autoimmunity about the need to be strict for certainly a while to determine what foods might be a problem
when you are trying to deal with an autoimmune case you do have to be straight for quite some time to try and clean the system out and then you can reintroduce things to see if they're offending but you have to do it one at a time to obviously you can do lab tests and stuff like that but but I was there's always a story of a case study that we found rather remarkable
I think this is important perhaps for your listeners when you talk about autoimmunity about the need to be strict for certainly a while to determine what foods might be a problem