The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i found a paper that was in preprint when i i don't i'm not sure if it was published already but it went and took all kinds of societies like eskimos and those from papua new guinea populations where the the diet was known okay and all spread from plants to 100 animals and the the protein isotope the it was uh it was as expected so i think it's fairly fairly reliable
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.