Paul Saladino· MD
would you agree with that I would agree with it but I'm telling you you'll find some pathologies that will not at me right so it's debated and like anything it's debated hopefully you know we're going we are we are headed in the right direction yeah there's a lot to correct there is a lot to correct most of them most of them most of the polenta politics that will argue with you will rely on the present tourism hunter-gatherer groups seventy percent of the array of the calories from plant honey as well so they say okay the other can do it while these people couldn't do it now this this precise decline of a large animal mega herbivores decline is your answer exactly hos change the environment completion environment were elephants around and many many of them is a completely different environment then the hodza is occupying today exactly 100 years ago the herds ahead elephants today we don't have any always know hey elephants are each in the kruger park it was a study it should happen kid they say killed sixteen hundred trees in year so they completely change the environment they are literally like gentle farmers a big firm okay they preserve the land for themselves so it is not a elephant around you have a completely different environment and this is what i they have the points get 40% of the calories because of one tree the baobab tree friday you see it made the fruit being the honey of the bees that are on it but when you have elephants you got a beverage they just kill it they hate they hate bubble tree so you you have elephants you don't have bubble so the environment today is not like the environment and this is like the recent research is relevant and finding more and more how important are large animals to to the environment what to change in the environment happened because of the disappearing of these larger so the extinction of this megafauna the changing of the size of the animals and we can go into this we've got some studies probably that almost certainly played into the way that humans eat and the extinction of the of the megafauna changes or the fact that we probably hunted the megafauna to extinction changes the way we eat and how much how available fat is and how available calories are and has led in situations like the hodza to I situations where people are need to eat plants or they eat plants because that's what's available but in the past when the megafauna were around we had a much greater return on our hunting investment and there's a strong argument that we were hunting megafauna we had much greater access to calories and fat am i understanding that properly using hundreds so if you use iron instead of based on two you save so much time did you walk around looking for plants but if you have to get the raw material for iron for a stone okay stone if you waste a lot of a lot of material I mean you you create a very sharp edge but become does very quickly so there is a lot of time and a lot of effort that's the big name in the maintaining an economy that relies on the stone to you today there every arrow so any way from Basra for both this analogy of 100 present recently together with with a politican together is just the complete nonsense I have a paper in for review and I hope it will be published soon but I